International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2024
Developmental uterovaginal anomalies and histologic findings in transgender patients receiving gender-affirming hysterectomies: A large case series.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nguyen Nghiem H, Kim Hoejeong, Tran Christina, Sumida Megan, Lansdowne Elisa, Galzote-Carino Rosanna
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of uterovaginal anomalies and histologic findings in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) patients seeking hysterectomies.
METHODS: All patients receiving gender-affirming hysterectomies between 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included uterovaginal anomalies and histological findings. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between variables of interest and whether they predict findings of uterovaginal anomalies, inactive endometrium, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, endometriosis, and cervical atrophy.
RESULTS: 278 patients received hysterectomies at an average age of 29.2 ± 8.3 years. Seven patients (2.5%) were found to have a developmental anomaly, including two bicornuate uterus (0.7%), two unicornuate uterus (0.7%), one septate uterus (0.4%), and two vaginal septum (0.7%). 60 patients (21.6%) were found to have inactive endometrium and 26 patients (9.4%) had cervical atrophy. Although 262 patients (94.2%) were on testosterone therapy, hormone duration was not a significant predictor of any uterine findings.
CONCLUSION: This study describes uterovaginal anomalies in a large cohort of patients receiving gender-affirming hysterectomies. Although long-term testosterone use is commonly believed to be associated with endometrial and cervical atrophy, this study shows no such association.
METHODS: All patients receiving gender-affirming hysterectomies between 2013 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included uterovaginal anomalies and histological findings. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate relationships between variables of interest and whether they predict findings of uterovaginal anomalies, inactive endometrium, adenomyosis, leiomyoma, endometriosis, and cervical atrophy.
RESULTS: 278 patients received hysterectomies at an average age of 29.2 ± 8.3 years. Seven patients (2.5%) were found to have a developmental anomaly, including two bicornuate uterus (0.7%), two unicornuate uterus (0.7%), one septate uterus (0.4%), and two vaginal septum (0.7%). 60 patients (21.6%) were found to have inactive endometrium and 26 patients (9.4%) had cervical atrophy. Although 262 patients (94.2%) were on testosterone therapy, hormone duration was not a significant predictor of any uterine findings.
CONCLUSION: This study describes uterovaginal anomalies in a large cohort of patients receiving gender-affirming hysterectomies. Although long-term testosterone use is commonly believed to be associated with endometrial and cervical atrophy, this study shows no such association.