Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
Intravitreal air bubbles following intravitreal injections: a comprehensive analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krauthammer Mark, Trabelsi Etty, Moisseiev Elad
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of residual air bubbles following intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, and to compare two techniques designed to reduce their occurrence.
METHODS: Patients who received intravitreal injections reported the presence of air bubbles following the procedure, and were followed to determine when they disappeared. Two techniques used to reduce air bubbles prior to injection were compared-tapping the syringe with the needle up ("upwards" technique) or down ("downwards" technique). Rates of residual air bubbles were compared between techniques, and between different drugs.
RESULTS: The study included 344 intravitreal injections, 172 injected with each technique. The overall rate of residual air bubbles was 11.3%, with 94.9% resolution by 48 h. The rate was significantly lower with the "downwards" technique (7.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.027). It was also significantly lower with ranibizumab injected using pre-filled syringes than with bevacizumab and aflibercept (0% vs. 12.1% and 14.7%, p < 0.0001). A questionnaire revealed patients reported medium levels of discomfort and a high importance of avoiding air bubbles.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual air bubbles are a common occurrence, likely to be experienced by most patients undergoing repeated injections. This phenomenon may be significantly reduced by using the described "downwards" technique, or pre-filled syringes.
METHODS: Patients who received intravitreal injections reported the presence of air bubbles following the procedure, and were followed to determine when they disappeared. Two techniques used to reduce air bubbles prior to injection were compared-tapping the syringe with the needle up ("upwards" technique) or down ("downwards" technique). Rates of residual air bubbles were compared between techniques, and between different drugs.
RESULTS: The study included 344 intravitreal injections, 172 injected with each technique. The overall rate of residual air bubbles was 11.3%, with 94.9% resolution by 48 h. The rate was significantly lower with the "downwards" technique (7.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.027). It was also significantly lower with ranibizumab injected using pre-filled syringes than with bevacizumab and aflibercept (0% vs. 12.1% and 14.7%, p < 0.0001). A questionnaire revealed patients reported medium levels of discomfort and a high importance of avoiding air bubbles.
CONCLUSIONS: Residual air bubbles are a common occurrence, likely to be experienced by most patients undergoing repeated injections. This phenomenon may be significantly reduced by using the described "downwards" technique, or pre-filled syringes.