DOI 10.1007/s10384-020-00747-y
Effect of peripapillary tilt direction and magnitude on central visual field defects in primary open-angle glaucoma with high myopia.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between peripapillary tilt and visual field (VF) defects in glaucomatous eyes with axial myopia.
STUDY
DESIGN
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
One hundred four eyes of 104 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with myopia were included (52 eyes with high myopia [HM], 26.5 mm ≤ axial length [AL] < 30.0 mm; and 52 eyes without HM, 24.0 mm < AL < 26.5 mm). The direction and magnitude of the peripapillary tilt were evaluated using optical coherence tomography. The eyes were divided into 12 groups according to the tilt directions defined by clock-hour sectors in a clockwise direction in the right eyes and in a counterclockwise direction in the left eyes. The mean deviation (MD) and central VF (CVF) values, ie, the mean threshold values of 4 paracentral points within 5 degrees of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm 30-2 test, were evaluated.
RESULTS
The direction of the tilt was toward sector 9 (47.1%) and sector 8 (34.6%). The MD and CVF values were significantly worse (P = 0.013 and P = 0.019, respectively) in the sector 9 group than in the sector 8 group. Furthermore, the smaller peripapillary tilt magnitude in the sector 9 group was negatively correlated (P = 0.0019) with the CVF but not with the MD (P = 0.1) among the POAG eyes with HM. In contrast, the ovality index in the sector 9 group was not significantly correlated with the MD (P = 0.4) or the CVF (P = 0.36).
CONCLUSION
A smaller temporal peripapillary tilt correlated with CVF defects in POAG eyes with HM. The peripapillary tilt direction and magnitude affect the CVF defect in POAG eyes with HM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.