MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/ehf2.15435

Медицинская библиотека · ESC heart failure · 2025

Assessing cardiovascular benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in high-risk undiagnosed HFpEF patients.

Liu Xinru, Wang Zhiyan, Hua Chang, Wu Yanfang, Tang Yangyang, Xiong Yuling, Liu Jingwei, Zhang Jiaqi, Lv Qiang, Jiang Chao, Dong Jianzeng, Du Xin

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is often underdiagnosed. This study evaluates the HFpEF-ABA score's ability to identify high-risk, undiagnosed HFpEF subgroups with elevated cardiovascular event rates and assesses the impact of intensive blood pressure control in these populations.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. The HFpEF-ABA score identified high-risk individuals with undiagnosed HFpEF. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine interactions between HFpEF-ABA score groups and intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure and cardiovascular disease death.

RESULTS

Among 9265 patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 9.4 years; 35.5% females), 559 primary outcomes occurred during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. An HFpEF-ABA score ≥ 90% was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96 (1.57-2.44); P < 0.001]. When treated as a continuous variable, higher HFpEF-ABA scores were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcome (P = 0.001), with a modest non-linear relationship observed (P for non-linearity = 0.040). In the intensive treatment group, the absolute reduction in primary outcomes was 5.0 per 1000 patient-years for scores < 90% and 11.2 per 1000 patient-years for ≥ 90%. Intensive blood pressure control reduced primary outcomes in both groups [<90%: aHR, 0.75 (0.62-0.90); ≥90%: aHR, 0.76 (0.51-1.13)] with no significant heterogeneity (P for interaction = 0.944). Serious adverse events did not increase in either group [<90%: aHR, 1.04 (0.96-1.11); ≥90%: aHR, 1.06 (0.88-1.28); P for interaction = 0.801].

CONCLUSIONS

The HFpEF-ABA score identifies high-risk patients with undiagnosed HFpEF who have elevated cardiovascular event rates and benefit from intensive blood pressure control without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Для цитирования: Liu Xinru, Wang Zhiyan, Hua Chang, Wu Yanfang, Tang Yangyang, Xiong Yuling, Liu Jingwei, Zhang Jiaqi, Lv Qiang, Jiang Chao, Dong Jianzeng, Du Xin. Assessing cardiovascular benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in high-risk undiagnosed HFpEF patients.. ESC heart failure. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.15435.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.