Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2001
The importance of the removal of the intrauterine device in genital colonization by actinomyces.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bonacho I, Pita S, Gómez-Besteiro M I
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether, in addition to treatment with antibiotics, it is necessary to remove the intrauterine device (IUD) to eliminate genital colonization by Actinomyces.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups. The intervention group did not have their IUDs removed, while the control group did. Both groups were treated with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. A total of 43 patients were included.
RESULTS: The patients from the intervention group and the control group proved to be comparable. The post-intervention cytology smear tested negative for Actinomyces in 100% of the patients whose IUD had been removed and in 66.7% of those whose IUD had not been removed (p = 0.005). The probability that colonization by Actinomyces will continue if the IUD is not removed is greater the longer the patient has been exposed to the IUD. After 24 months, relative risk (RR) = 2, after 36 months RR = 2.16 and after 48 months RR = 2.66.
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the IUD has been effective in genital colonization by Actinomyces. The protective effect exerted by the removal of the IUD was found to be greater in proportion to the length of time the patient had used it.
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups. The intervention group did not have their IUDs removed, while the control group did. Both groups were treated with trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole. A total of 43 patients were included.
RESULTS: The patients from the intervention group and the control group proved to be comparable. The post-intervention cytology smear tested negative for Actinomyces in 100% of the patients whose IUD had been removed and in 66.7% of those whose IUD had not been removed (p = 0.005). The probability that colonization by Actinomyces will continue if the IUD is not removed is greater the longer the patient has been exposed to the IUD. After 24 months, relative risk (RR) = 2, after 36 months RR = 2.16 and after 48 months RR = 2.66.
CONCLUSIONS: The removal of the IUD has been effective in genital colonization by Actinomyces. The protective effect exerted by the removal of the IUD was found to be greater in proportion to the length of time the patient had used it.