MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2008

CT and MRI in the evaluation of craniospinal involvement with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia in McCune-Albright syndrome.

Bulakbaşi Nail, Bozlar Uğur, Karademir Ibrahim, Kocaoğlu Murat, Somuncu Ibrahim

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In this study, the efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of craniospinal involvement with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia (PFD) in McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) and related complications were reviewed. In CT, ground-glass appearance with well-defined borders was seen, with medullary widening and cortical thinning. More rarely, cystic/necrotic areas were observed within involved bone. These lesions were seen as hypointense in T1-weighted sequences and as hyperintense in T2-weighted sequences of MRI. There was no heterogeneous contrast enhancement. Cystic/necrotic areas were seen as hyperintense images on T2-weighted sequences. While bone marrow involvement was shown more clearly with MRI, compression of cranial and spinal nerves was determined most effectively by evaluation of CT and MRI together. CT and MRI should be employed together in order to demonstrate the extent of disease, and complications of craniospinal involvement of PFD in patients with MAS.

Для цитирования: Bulakbaşi Nail, Bozlar Uğur, Karademir Ibrahim, Kocaoğlu Murat, Somuncu Ibrahim. CT and MRI in the evaluation of craniospinal involvement with polyostotic fibrous dysplasia in McCune-Albright syndrome.. Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey). 2008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.