MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.70124

Медицинская библиотека · BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026

Prediction Models for Severe Maternal Outcomes in Non-ICU Settings: Systematic Review.

Luo Zhongchen, Li Jiangyan, Liu Xiaofang, Lu Xianhuan, Tang Jiao, Zhang Huan, Wang Qing, Ding Xiaotong, Chen Hongli, Li Zheng

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Numerous risk assessment tools for severe maternal outcomes (SMOs) exist, but systematic evaluations of prediction models for non-ICU settings are lacking, where the majority of antenatal and intrapartum care is provided.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and critically appraise prognostic models for predicting SMOs in non-ICU settings.

SEARCH STRATEGY: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched from June 1, 2009, to November 22, 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies developing, validating or updating multivariable prognostic models for SMOs in non-ICU settings were included. Eligible populations were pregnant women and those within 42 days postpartum.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently conducted screening, data extraction and quality assessment using CHARMS and PROBAST AI. A narrative synthesis was performed due to study heterogeneity.

MAIN

RESULTS

Thirteen studies reporting 15 evaluations of 13 distinct prognostic models were included. Study populations encompassed pregnant or postpartum women in non-ICU settings, including general obstetric admissions and specific high-risk cohorts (acute fatty liver of pregnancy, liver dysfunction, pulmonary hypertension and cardiac arrest). Models demonstrated moderate to good discrimination (C-statistics 0.74-0.95), yet all 15 evaluations were assessed as high risk of bias due to inadequate sample sizes, inappropriate variable selection, poor missing data management, arbitrary categorisation of continuous predictors, temporal misalignments between predictor measurement and intended use, and insufficient internal validation. Only five models underwent external validation, and none reported calibration performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings underscore the need for enhanced methodological rigour, models tailored to specific gestational stages, comprehensive outcome definitions and dynamic risk assessment, thereby facilitating their feasible integration into clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Luo Zhongchen, Li Jiangyan, Liu Xiaofang, Lu Xianhuan, Tang Jiao, Zhang Huan, Wang Qing, Ding Xiaotong, Chen Hongli, Li Zheng. Prediction Models for Severe Maternal Outcomes in Non-ICU Settings: Systematic Review.. BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.70124.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.