Human pathology · 2026
L1CAM expression in eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic insights from a multicenter cohort.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kabul Selva, Yaprak Bayrak Busra, Ozbek Busra, Ozsagir Elif, Yıldırım Nazif Alperen, Ozturk Ece, Jafarzadeh Hamed, Biltekin Burcu, Buyukgok Melek, Sungu Nuran, Oktay Murat, Coban Ganime, Kosemehmetoglu Kemal, Acosta Andres M, Cheng Liang, Akgul Mahmut
Аннотация
Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC-RCC) is a recently recognized eosinophilic renal neoplasm characterized by distinctive morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features, including frequent TSC/mTOR pathway alterations. Recently, L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) has gained increasing recognition as a diagnostically and biologically relevant marker in selected eosinophilic renal neoplasms; however, its expression profile in ESC-RCC has not been systematically investigated. We aimed to evaluate L1CAM expression in a multicenter cohort of ESC-RCCs and correlate the findings with clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic features. A retrospective multicenter cohort of 11 ESC-RCCs was collected. Clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic findings were recorded. Immunohistochemistry for L1CAM was performed on representative whole tissue sections and semi-quantitatively scored based on the percentage of positive tumor cells. The cohort included 9 female and 2 male patients with a median age of 50 years (range, 39-79). L1CAM expression was identified in 7 of 11 tumors (63.6%), including 5 cases with diffuse membranous (3+) staining and 2 cases with intermediate (2+) staining; no tumor showed only focal (1+) expression. All tumors showed the characteristic morphology of ESC-RCC and expressed KRT20, irrespective of L1CAM status. Among tumors evaluated with additional markers, SDHB expression was retained in all 6 tested tumors and GATA3 was negative in all 5 tested tumors. Molecular testing was not performed in this cohort. Follow-up was available for all 11 patients (median, 10 months), with all patients alive without disease at last follow-up. Our findings expand the known immunophenotypic spectrum of ESC-RCC by demonstrating L1CAM expression in a substantial subset of tumors. However, because L1CAM expression is neither sensitive nor specific for ESC-RCC, positive or negative staining does not support or exclude the diagnosis and does not currently justify routine use of L1CAM in the diagnostic evaluation of morphologically suspected ESC-RCC.