Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2022
Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome in daily clinical practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Wolff Liseth, Vissink Arjan, van Nimwegen Jolien F, van Zuiden Greetje, Mossel Esther, Olie Lisette, Stel Alja J, Delli Konstantina, Verstappen Gwenny M, Kroese Frans G M, Bootsma Hendrika, Arends Suzanne
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To explore Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in a standard of care cohort of patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and to compare patient characteristics including EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) between PASS and non-PASS groups.
METHODS: All pSS patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR classification criteria from the Registry of Sjögren's Syndrome LongiTudinal (RESULT) cohort, who had available PASS data at baseline were included. Patient-reported outcomes included the PASS question: "Considering all the different ways your disease is affecting you, if you were to stay in this state for the next few months, do you consider your current state satisfactory?"; yes: PASS / no: non-PASS.
RESULTS: Of the 278 included pSS patients, 199 (72%) had an acceptable symptom state according to the PASS question, and median ESSPRI was 6 (IQR 4-7). In the PASS group, 118 (59%) patients had an unacceptable symptom state according to ESSPRI (score ≥5). In multivariable regression analyses, ESSPRI and disease duration were independently associated with presence of PASS. The accuracy of ESSPRI to predict PASS was fair (AUC of 0.78). The cut-off point of ESSPRI for presence of PASS with the highest Youden's index was 7.2 (sensitivity 85%, specificity 56%), followed by 5.2 (sensitivity 48%, specificity 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pSS patients reported being in an acceptable symptom state according to the PASS question, despite high ESSPRI scores. In our standard of care cohort, the optimal cut-off point of ESSPRI to predict PASS is different when focusing on sensitivity (±7) or specificity (±5).
METHODS: All pSS patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR classification criteria from the Registry of Sjögren's Syndrome LongiTudinal (RESULT) cohort, who had available PASS data at baseline were included. Patient-reported outcomes included the PASS question: "Considering all the different ways your disease is affecting you, if you were to stay in this state for the next few months, do you consider your current state satisfactory?"; yes: PASS / no: non-PASS.
RESULTS: Of the 278 included pSS patients, 199 (72%) had an acceptable symptom state according to the PASS question, and median ESSPRI was 6 (IQR 4-7). In the PASS group, 118 (59%) patients had an unacceptable symptom state according to ESSPRI (score ≥5). In multivariable regression analyses, ESSPRI and disease duration were independently associated with presence of PASS. The accuracy of ESSPRI to predict PASS was fair (AUC of 0.78). The cut-off point of ESSPRI for presence of PASS with the highest Youden's index was 7.2 (sensitivity 85%, specificity 56%), followed by 5.2 (sensitivity 48%, specificity 90%).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pSS patients reported being in an acceptable symptom state according to the PASS question, despite high ESSPRI scores. In our standard of care cohort, the optimal cut-off point of ESSPRI to predict PASS is different when focusing on sensitivity (±7) or specificity (±5).