Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999) · 2019
[Transrectal ozone and magnetic therapy for treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis].
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Katibov M I, Alibekov M M
Аннотация
AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of combined transrectal ozone and magnetic therapy for the treatment of chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 142 men with CBP were included in the study and allocated to different treatment, including standard therapy for 6 weeks (n=40), transrectal magnetic therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=35), transrectal ozone therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=37), transrectal magnetic and ozone therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=30). Treatment results were evaluated 3 months after the completion of therapy.
RESULTS: The most pronounced positive improvement in all evaluated parameters was observed among patients who received both magnetic and ozone therapy, according to the criteria of all domains of the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, IIEF-5 questionnaire, and based on the changes in prostate volume, maximum urination rate, residual urine volume and microscopic examination of prostate secretion.
CONCLUSION: To achieve optimal results in the treatment of CBP, it is necessary to use both consequently magnetic and ozone therapy, in addition to standard therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 142 men with CBP were included in the study and allocated to different treatment, including standard therapy for 6 weeks (n=40), transrectal magnetic therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=35), transrectal ozone therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=37), transrectal magnetic and ozone therapy in addition to standard therapy (n=30). Treatment results were evaluated 3 months after the completion of therapy.
RESULTS: The most pronounced positive improvement in all evaluated parameters was observed among patients who received both magnetic and ozone therapy, according to the criteria of all domains of the NIH-CPSI questionnaire, IIEF-5 questionnaire, and based on the changes in prostate volume, maximum urination rate, residual urine volume and microscopic examination of prostate secretion.
CONCLUSION: To achieve optimal results in the treatment of CBP, it is necessary to use both consequently magnetic and ozone therapy, in addition to standard therapy.