MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/00365529709025063

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 1997

Epidemiology of Whipple's disease in Germany. Analysis of 110 patients diagnosed in 1965-95.

von Herbay A, Otto H F, Stolte M, Borchard F, Kirchner T, Ditton H J, Maiwald M

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of Whipple's disease (WD) is obscure. To obtain basic data, we performed an evaluation of WD patients in Germany.

METHODS

Information was collected from 110 WD patients diagnosed during 1965-95 at 5 institutions in different regions of Germany. Four items were evaluated: 1) year in which the diagnosis was made; 2) residence and 3) age at the time of diagnosis; and 4) sex.

RESULTS

WD patients originated from all parts of Germany. The incidence of new cases was relatively stable, with a mean of one to two cases per year per collecting centre. In 1995, a maximum of 13 new WD patients was diagnosed. There was a significant increase in the mean age of patients (1965-75, 48.7 years; confidence interval, +/- 3.98 years; 1976-85, 50.7 years, +/- 3.69 years; 1986-95, 57.0 years, +/- 2.80 years; P < 0.01) and an increasing proportion of women (1965-85, 4%; 1986-1995, 22%).

CONCLUSIONS

Whipple's disease is not quite as rare as commonly assumed. There is no obvious geographic predominance. During the past three decades, the demography of WD patients has changed.

Для цитирования: von Herbay A, Otto H F, Stolte M, Borchard F, Kirchner T, Ditton H J, Maiwald M. Epidemiology of Whipple's disease in Germany. Analysis of 110 patients diagnosed in 1965-95.. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 1997. DOI: 10.3109/00365529709025063.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.