MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.015

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2015

Spinal Neurenteric Cyst in Association with Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review.

Can Anil, Dos Santos Rubio Ellianne J, Jasperse Bas, Verdijk Robert M, Harhangi B Sanjay

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Spinal neurenteric cysts, also known as endodermal or enterogenous cysts, are rare epithelium-lined structures of presumed endodermal origin. Congenital vertebral anomalies are frequently seen in patients with neurenteric cysts, most typically anterior spina bifida, butterfly vertebrae, and hemivertebrae. However, few series of intraspinal neurenteric cysts accompanied by Klippel-Feil syndrome have been reported previously.

CASE DESCRIPTION: Our purpose is to present the clinical, radiological, and histological results of a 29-year-old patient with a spinal neurenteric cyst associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome and to review previous reported cases of neurenteric cysts associated with Klippel-Feil syndrome. In our patient, cervical radiography demonstrated C5-T1 vertebral fusion and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a large intradural cystic mass. The cystic lesion was removed successfully, and it was histopathologically diagnosed as a neurenteric cyst.

CONCLUSION

Neurenteric cysts should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of an intraspinal cystic mass seen in the setting of vertebral anomalies.

Для цитирования: Can Anil, Dos Santos Rubio Ellianne J, Jasperse Bas, Verdijk Robert M, Harhangi B Sanjay. Spinal Neurenteric Cyst in Association with Klippel-Feil Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review.. World neurosurgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.03.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.