Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2026
Manuka Honey Sinus Irrigation Versus Systemic Itraconazole in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Randomised Clinical Trial for Efficacy and Safety.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamead Khalaf, Ismail Mostafa, Abdelkarim Abdelrahim A, Abdelhakim Abdelhakim Atef, Abdelzaher Khaled Mohamed
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a persistent sinus condition caused by fungal allergies. Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and postoperative systematic and local medical therapies are the most common treatment protocols. Although oral antifungals such as itraconazole are frequently utilised postoperatively, there is increasing interest in alternate therapies that exhibit fewer systemic adverse effects. Manuka honey, recognised for its powerful antibacterial, antifungal and anti-inflammatory characteristics, is a promising alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Manuka honey sinus irrigation in comparison with oral itraconazole for the postoperative management of AFRS.
METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with AFRS were recruited for the current randomised clinical trial after ESS. Patients in the two groups randomly received either oral itraconazole (Group A) or Manuka honey sinus irrigation (Group B) for 6 weeks postoperatively. Both cohorts were monitored for 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores, total IgE levels and SNOT-22 scores were significantly improved in Group B after Manuka honey sinus irrigation. Both groups had similar Lund-Mackay radiological scores and numbers of postoperative sinus infections during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative Manuka honey sinus irrigation is more effective than oral itraconazole for reducing symptoms and preventing the recurrence of AFRS. It is considered a promising therapeutic alternative in the postoperative management of AFRS.
METHODS: Thirty patients diagnosed with AFRS were recruited for the current randomised clinical trial after ESS. Patients in the two groups randomly received either oral itraconazole (Group A) or Manuka honey sinus irrigation (Group B) for 6 weeks postoperatively. Both cohorts were monitored for 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scores, total IgE levels and SNOT-22 scores were significantly improved in Group B after Manuka honey sinus irrigation. Both groups had similar Lund-Mackay radiological scores and numbers of postoperative sinus infections during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative Manuka honey sinus irrigation is more effective than oral itraconazole for reducing symptoms and preventing the recurrence of AFRS. It is considered a promising therapeutic alternative in the postoperative management of AFRS.