European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2007
Compared fate of small-diameter Contegras and homografts in the pulmonary position.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sinzobahamvya Nicodème, Asfour Boulos, Boscheinen Margaretha, Photiadis Joachim, Fink Christoph, Schindler Ehrenfried, Hraska Victor, Brecher Anne Marie
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes whether small-diameter Contegras behave in the same way as small-diameter homografts, when implanted for the first time in pulmonary position.
METHODS: Small-diameter conduits include 12 and 14 mm Contegras and 8-14 mm homografts. Graft dysfunction is defined as right ventricular outflow tract obstruction with peak echo-Doppler gradient>40 mmHg, or grade III/IV graft regurgitation. Graft failure is defined as need for conduit replacement or need for catheter or surgical reintervention. Thirty-eight patients who received small Contegras (n=25) and small homografts (n=13) from October 2002 to end December 2006 were studied. The most frequent indication was pulmonary atresia and ventricular septal defect (n=20; 10 associated with major aorto-pulmonary collateral arteries), followed by truncus arteriosus (n=12). Most patients' characteristics were comparable except that recipients of homografts were smaller (p for body area=0.014). Survival, freedom from graft dysfunction, failure and explantation were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare outcomes.
RESULTS: There were three early and four late deaths. No death was graft related. Survival was 80+/-8.2% for patients with Contegras and 77+/-11.7% for those with allografts: p=0.82. Mean follow-up duration is 22+/-16 months. Freedom from dysfunction for Contegras conduits decreased in the first 6 months and stabilized at 58+/-11% from month 14. For homografts it decreased only 1 year after implantation, down to 35+/-19.7% from month 31: p=0.61. Freedom from Contegras failure diminished the first 16 months to level out at 57+/-13%. No homograft failed the first 2 years. With a p-value of 0.14, homografts tended to fail less frequently. Five grafts were explanted. Freedom from explantation was similar (p=0.98): 90+/-6.7% for Contegras and 75+/-21.6% for homografts at year 3.
CONCLUSION: In the first 4 years after pulmonary implantation of small-diameter Contegras and homografts, the fate of both conduits was statistically similar, in spite of different behavior. As Contegras is 'off-the-shelf' available, it constitutes a sound alternative to homograft for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in neonates and infants.
METHODS: Small-diameter conduits include 12 and 14 mm Contegras and 8-14 mm homografts. Graft dysfunction is defined as right ventricular outflow tract obstruction with peak echo-Doppler gradient>40 mmHg, or grade III/IV graft regurgitation. Graft failure is defined as need for conduit replacement or need for catheter or surgical reintervention. Thirty-eight patients who received small Contegras (n=25) and small homografts (n=13) from October 2002 to end December 2006 were studied. The most frequent indication was pulmonary atresia and ventricular septal defect (n=20; 10 associated with major aorto-pulmonary collateral arteries), followed by truncus arteriosus (n=12). Most patients' characteristics were comparable except that recipients of homografts were smaller (p for body area=0.014). Survival, freedom from graft dysfunction, failure and explantation were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare outcomes.
RESULTS: There were three early and four late deaths. No death was graft related. Survival was 80+/-8.2% for patients with Contegras and 77+/-11.7% for those with allografts: p=0.82. Mean follow-up duration is 22+/-16 months. Freedom from dysfunction for Contegras conduits decreased in the first 6 months and stabilized at 58+/-11% from month 14. For homografts it decreased only 1 year after implantation, down to 35+/-19.7% from month 31: p=0.61. Freedom from Contegras failure diminished the first 16 months to level out at 57+/-13%. No homograft failed the first 2 years. With a p-value of 0.14, homografts tended to fail less frequently. Five grafts were explanted. Freedom from explantation was similar (p=0.98): 90+/-6.7% for Contegras and 75+/-21.6% for homografts at year 3.
CONCLUSION: In the first 4 years after pulmonary implantation of small-diameter Contegras and homografts, the fate of both conduits was statistically similar, in spite of different behavior. As Contegras is 'off-the-shelf' available, it constitutes a sound alternative to homograft for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in neonates and infants.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AnimalsAortopulmonary Septal DefectBioprosthesisCattleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Septal Defects, VentricularHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHeart VentriclesHumansInfantJugular VeinsPulmonary AtresiaReoperationTransplantation, HeterologousTransposition of Great VesselsTreatment OutcomeTruncus Arteriosus, PersistentVentricular Dysfunction, Right