MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00763-2

Медицинская библиотека · The Annals of thoracic surgery · 1998

Comparison of tissue reactions in the tracheal mucosa surrounding a bioabsorbable and silicone airway stents.

Korpela A, Aarnio P, Sariola H, Törmälä P, Harjula A

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Treatment of tracheobronchial stenosis is problematic. Conservative methods include stenting the stenotic area, but an ideal stent has not yet been developed. Bioabsorbable airway stents offer benefits; the extraction of the device is unnecessary, and the airway preserves its normal function after stent resorption. The aim of this study was to examine the suitability of self-reinforced poly-L-lactide as a material for an airway stent.

METHODS

A spiral airway stent made of 0.7-mm wire of self-reinforced poly-L-lactide was implanted operatively in 9 rabbits intratracheally; silicone stents served as controls.

RESULTS

Silicone stents had a tendency to become stenosed with encrustation material and to develop a hyperplastic polyp at both ends. Self-reinforced poly-L-lactide stents were well tolerated and caused no foreign body reaction, and they had a tendency to penetrate into the tracheal wall. They had disappeared at the end of the follow-up of 10 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This experimental study showed that bioabsorbable self-reinforced poly-L-lactide is a promising material for an airway stent for treatment of airway stenosis.

Для цитирования: Korpela A, Aarnio P, Sariola H, Törmälä P, Harjula A. Comparison of tissue reactions in the tracheal mucosa surrounding a bioabsorbable and silicone airway stents.. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00763-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.