MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000002450

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2016

Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Lingual Nerve Deficits After Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

Shawky Maha, Mosleh Mohamed, Jan Ahmed M, Jadu Fatima M

СтатьяМетаанализОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy is a relatively common maxillofacial surgical procedure. The most commonly reported complication is neurosensory disturbances (NSD). The inferior alveolar nerve is by far the most commonly affected but sporadic reports of NSD of the lingual nerve also exist. The aim of this meta-analysis is to estimate the incidence of lingual nerve NSD following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A systematic search of the English literature was conducted in February 2015 including several databases and using numerous MeSH terms. Article selection was based on preset criteria. Then pertinent data were collected and the incidence of the complications was calculated.

RESULTS

Three articles were included in the meta-analysis. Incidence rates ranged between 0.3% and 18% with a pooled incidence of 0.7%.

DISCUSSION: Lingual nerve NSD is an infrequent complication of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Fortunately, the complication usually resolves within 1 year of the procedure.

Для цитирования: Shawky Maha, Mosleh Mohamed, Jan Ahmed M, Jadu Fatima M. Meta-analysis of the Incidence of Lingual Nerve Deficits After Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000002450.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.