Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
Nephrectomy in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: a consensus statement of the ERA Genes & Kidney Working Group.
Consensus StatementСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Geertsema Paul, Gansevoort Ron T, Arici Mustafa, Capasso Giovambattista, Cornec-Le Gall Emilie, Furlano Monica, Fuster Daniel G, Galletti Flavia, Gómez Dos Santos Victoria, Perez Gomez Maria Vanessa, Goumenos Dimitrios, Halbritter Jan, Jambon Eva, Korst Uwe, Leliveld-Kors Anna M, Musquera Mireia, Figueiredo Arnaldo, Nijenhuis Tom, Olsburgh Jonathon, Pol Robert A, Sayer John A, Stippel Dirk, Torra Roser, Müller Roman-Ulrich, Casteleijn Niek F, members of the study group
Аннотация
A substantial number of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) undergo a nephrectomy, especially in workup for a kidney transplantation. Currently, there is no evidence-based algorithm to guide clinicians about which patients should undergo nephrectomy, the optimal timing of this procedure, or the preferred surgical technique. This systematic review-based consensus statement aimed to answer important questions regarding nephrectomy in ADPKD. A literature review was performed and extended to a meta-analysis when possible. For this purpose, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to May 2024. Fifty-four publications, describing a total of 2391 procedures, were included. In addition, an exploratory questionnaire was sent to urologists, nephrologists, and transplant surgeons. These sources were used to develop practice points about indications, complications, mortality, and timing and technique of nephrectomy. In addition, data on renal embolization as a potential alternative to nephrectomy were explored and summarized. To reach consensus, practice points were defined and improved in three Delphi survey rounds by experts of the European Renal Association Working Group Genes & Kidney and the European Association of Urology Section of Transplantation Urology. A total of 23 practice points/statements were developed, all of which reached consensus. Among others, it was deemed that nephrectomy can be performed successfully for various indications and is an intermediate risk procedure with acceptable mortality and minimal impact on kidney graft function when performed before, in the same session or after transplantation. The complication rate seems to increase when the procedure is performed as an emergency. During the workup for transplantation, patient complaints should be assessed routinely by questionnaires to indicate symptom burden. Deciding on the need for nephrectomy and exploring potential alternatives such as kidney embolization should be a process of shared decision-making, preferably after multidisciplinary consultation.