MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Archivos espanoles de urologia · 2016

Influence of barbed suture in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Cepeda M, De la Cruz B, Amón J H, Conde C, Ruiz M, Martínez-Sagarra J M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the influence of barbed suture in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 150 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was carried out by our department. The patients were divided in two groups according to the kind of suture used during the vesicourethral anastomosis: conventional 3-0 absorbable multifilament running suture (group 1) and bidirectional barbed suture (Quill®) (group 2). Operating time, postoperatory urinary fistula, hospital stay and catheter duration were analyzed in both groups.

RESULTS

After the analysis of all the preoperative variables, such as age, PSA, prostate volume, Gleason and stage on biopsy, no statistically significant differences were found in both groups. Operating time was significantly shorter in Group 2 (169±43 min vs 215±45 min, p=0.00). Statistically significant differences were found regarding postoperative urinary fistula rate, hospital stay and urethral catheterization duration, favourable to Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of bidirectional barbed suture (Quill®) for vesicourethral anastomosis in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, when compared with the conventional suture, shortens surgical time, reduces urinary fistula rate, catheter duration and hospital stay, as the anastomosis is easily performed and prevents leakage.

Для цитирования: Cepeda M, De la Cruz B, Amón J H, Conde C, Ruiz M, Martínez-Sagarra J M. Influence of barbed suture in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.. Archivos espanoles de urologia. 2016.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.