MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.027

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025

Intensive vs Conventional Intraoperative Blood Pressure Management on Cardiovascular Events After Major Abdominal Surgery: The BP-CARES Randomized Trial.

Zhao Bingcheng, Zhang Jiaqiang, Xie Yishan, Wu Zhuoxi, Guo Gaofeng, Lei Shaohui, Liu Jiaming, Liu Huamin, Liu Jian, Liu Weifeng, Li Cai, Lian Yangyang, Tan Yuting, Wang Dongxin, Li Hong, Sessler Daniel I, Liu Kexuan

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative hypotension is associated with cardiovascular complications after major noncardiac surgery, but randomized trials assessing whether intensive blood pressure management during surgery can reduce these complications have shown inconsistent results.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether intensive intraoperative blood pressure management reduces the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular complications within 30 days after major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated parallel-group trial, patients at 3 Chinese sites were randomly assigned (1:1) to intensive blood pressure management targeting intraoperative MAP ≥80 mm Hg (intensive strategy group) or conventional management targeting intraoperative MAP ≥ the higher of 65 mm Hg or 60% of preoperative baseline pressure (conventional strategy group). We included patients aged ≥45 years who had known cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors and were scheduled for inpatient abdominal surgery expected to last at least 2 hours. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial injury or infarction, new-onset clinically important arrhythmias, acute heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, and all-cause death within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Between June 30, 2020, and September 23, 2022, 1,500 patients were enrolled, of whom 1,477 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (739 in the intensive strategy group and 738 in the conventional strategy group). Patients assigned to intensive intraoperative blood pressure management experienced a lower burden of hypotension exposure, as assessed by several measures. For example, the median cumulative duration of MAP <65 mm Hg was 1 minute (Q1-Q3: 0-7 minutes) in the intensive strategy group, compared with 8 minutes (Q1-Q3: 0-20 minutes) in the conventional strategy group. The primary composite outcome occurred in 107 of 739 patients (14.5%) in the intensive strategy group and 100 of 738 patients (13.6%) in the conventional strategy group (relative risk: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.83-1.38; P = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

In high-risk patients having major abdominal inpatient surgery, intensive intraoperative blood pressure management targeting a mean arterial pressure ≥80 mm Hg did not reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events compared with the conventional target of ≥65 mm Hg and 60% of the preoperative baseline.

Для цитирования: Zhao Bingcheng, Zhang Jiaqiang, Xie Yishan, Wu Zhuoxi, Guo Gaofeng, Lei Shaohui, Liu Jiaming, Liu Huamin, Liu Jian, Liu Weifeng, Li Cai, Lian Yangyang, Tan Yuting, Wang Dongxin, Li Hong, Sessler Daniel I, Liu Kexuan. Intensive vs Conventional Intraoperative Blood Pressure Management on Cardiovascular Events After Major Abdominal Surgery: The BP-CARES Randomized Trial.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.07.027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.