MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/den.70130

Медицинская библиотека · Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026

Efficacy and Recovery of Remimazolam Versus Midazolam in Sedated Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Japan.

Yamaguchi Daisuke, Ichijima Ryoji, Ikehara Hisatomo, Minoda Yosuke, Esaki Mitsuru, Takamori Ayako, Yoh Akiyoshi, Shirouzu Moeko, Sadashima Kento, Fujimura Yutaro, Shimamura Takuya, Takedomi Hironobu, Akutagawa Takashi, Tsuruoka Nanae, Sakata Yasuhisa, Wada Takuya, Kusano Chika, Shimoda Ryo, Esaki Motohiro

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Sedation during colonoscopy is becoming increasingly important. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has a shorter pharmacokinetic half-life than that of midazolam. This study examined whether remimazolam provides superior sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial included adults (18-80 years) scheduled for sedated colonoscopy. Participants were randomized to the remimazolam and midazolam groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of ambulatory patients 5 min after colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes were successful pre-procedure sedation (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation [MOAA/S] ≤ 4), recovery time, total sedative dose, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled and analyzed (remimazolam, n = 19; midazolam, n = 21). At 5 min post-colonoscopy, ambulation was achieved in 100% (19/19) of remimazolam patients and 19.1% (4/21) of midazolam patients (p < 0.0001). The median time [interquartile range (IQR)] from procedure end to full alertness (MOAA/S = 5) was 0 [0-0] min for remimazolam and 10 [5-20] min for midazolam (p < 0.0001). The median time [IQR] from procedure end to independent ambulation was 0 [0-5] min for remimazolam and 20 [10-30] min for midazolam (p < 0.001). Pre-procedure sedation was successful (MOAA/S ≤ 4) in 100% of both groups. The median amount [IQR] of total sedative dose was 5 [4-6] mg for remimazolam and 3 [3] mg for midazolam. Hypoxemia occurred in 5.3% and 9.5% of patients in the remimazolam and midazolam groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with midazolam, remimazolam resulted in significantly faster recovery after colonoscopy in Japanese patients, with comparable achievement of target sedation and a low incidence of hypoxemia.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION: Trial number: jRCTs071240062.

Для цитирования: Yamaguchi Daisuke, Ichijima Ryoji, Ikehara Hisatomo, Minoda Yosuke, Esaki Mitsuru, Takamori Ayako, Yoh Akiyoshi, Shirouzu Moeko, Sadashima Kento, Fujimura Yutaro, Shimamura Takuya, Takedomi Hironobu, Akutagawa Takashi, Tsuruoka Nanae, Sakata Yasuhisa, Wada Takuya, Kusano Chika, Shimoda Ryo, Esaki Motohiro. Efficacy and Recovery of Remimazolam Versus Midazolam in Sedated Colonoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in Japan.. Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/den.70130.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.