MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7705/biomedica.v35i3.2371

Медицинская библиотека · Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2015

Economic analysis of routine neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in total thyroidectomy.

Sanabria Álvaro, Ramírez Adonis

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Thyroidectomy is a common surgery. Routine searching of the recurrent laryngeal nerve is the most important strategy to avoid palsy. Neuromonitoring has been recommended to decrease recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

OBJECTIVE

To assess if neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy is cost-effective in a developing country.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

We designed a decision analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of recurrent laryngeal nerve neuromonitoring. For probabilities, we used data from a meta-analysis. Utility was measured using preference values. We considered direct costs. We conducted a deterministic and a probabilistic analysis.

RESULTS

We did not find differences in utility between arms. The frequency of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was 1% in the neuromonitor group and 1.6% for the standard group. Thyroidectomy without monitoring was the less expensive alternative. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was COP$ 9,112,065.

CONCLUSION

Routine neuromonitoring in total thyroidectomy with low risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury is neither cost-useful nor cost-effective in the Colombian health system.

Для цитирования: Sanabria Álvaro, Ramírez Adonis. Economic analysis of routine neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve in total thyroidectomy.. Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud. 2015. DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.v35i3.2371.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.