MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2011

The effects of potential neuroprotective agents on rat facial function recovery following facial nerve injury.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Vakharia Kalpesh T, Lindsay Robin W, Knox Christopher, Edwards Colin, Henstrom Doug, Weinberg Julie, Hadlock Tessa A, Heaton James T

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a series of pharmacologic agents with potential neuroprotective effects accelerate and/or improve facial function recovery after facial nerve crush injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized animal study.

SETTING: Tertiary care facility.

METHODS: Eighty female Wistar-Hannover rats underwent head restraint implantation and daily conditioning. Animals then underwent unilateral crush injury to the main trunk of the facial nerve and were randomized to receive treatment with atorvastatin (n = 10), sildenafil (n = 10), darbepoetin (n = 20), or a corresponding control agent (n = 40). The return of whisking function was tracked throughout the recovery period.

RESULTS: All rats initiated the return of whisking function from nerve crush by day 12. Darbepoetin-treated rats (n = 20) showed significantly improved whisking amplitude and velocity across the recovery period, with several days of significant pairwise differences vs comparable control rats (n = 16) across the first 2 weeks of whisking function return. In contrast, rats treated with sildenafil (n = 10) and atorvastatin (n = 10) did not show significant improvement in whisking function recovery after facial nerve crush compared to controls. By week 8, all darbepoetin-treated animals and comparable nerve crush control animals fully recovered whisking function and were statistically indistinguishable.

CONCLUSION: Among the 3 potentially neuroprotective agents evaluated, only darbepoetin administration resulted in accelerated recovery of whisking parameters after facial nerve crush injury. Further efforts to define the mechanism of action and translate these findings to the use of darbepoetin in the care of patients with traumatic facial paralysis are needed.

Предметные рубрики MeSH