Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lyons M Melanie, Auckley Dennis H, Mokhlesi Babak, Charchaflieh Jean G, Myers John V, Yilmaz Meltem, Williams Lisa M, Khan Meena S, Card Elizabeth B, Gelfand Brian J, Pilla Michael A, Loftsgard Theodore O, Sawyer Amy M, Matura Lea Ann, Carlucci Melissa A, Sahni Ashima S, Glaser Kathleen M, Al Ghussain Dana E, Brock Guy N, Bhatt Nitin Y, Magalang Ulysses J, Rosen Ilene M, Gali Bhargavi
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Physicians-in-training (residents, fellows) and advanced practice providers (APPs) receive limited education on sleep disorders, including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). They often assess patients first. We aimed to understand their views on OSA and screening for OSA in the perioperative period.
METHODS: Electronic-mail surveys were sent to physicians-in-training and APPs, in 5 categories of practice (anesthesiology, internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology/gynecologic oncology, and surgery) at 9 major institutions. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests evaluated associations between participant characteristics (clinical role, physician years of training, APP years of practice, categories of practice) and survey responses (perception of OSA, perioperative risk factor, screening/managing of perioperative OSA) stratified by institution. False discovery rate (FDR) adjustment accounted for multiple comparisons (FDR-adjusted-P values) of associations between multiple characteristics and a given response. Breslow-Day tests evaluated the homogeneity of odds ratios from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.
RESULTS: We received 2,236/6,724 (33.3%) responses. Almost all (97%) agreed OSA represents a risk factor for perioperative complications. Many (37.9%) were unaware which screening tool was used at their institution, with differences by clinical role (FDR-adjusted-P < .001), with APPs reporting not knowing more than residents and fellows, and across category of practice (FDR-adjusted-P < .001). While 66.5% routinely asked perioperative patients about signs/symptoms of OSA, 33.5% did not. There were differences by clinical role (FDR-adjusted-P < .001), as APPs reported asking about OSA more frequently than residents/fellows; and, by category of practice (FDR-adjusted-P < .001) as anesthesia and medical specialties reported asking about OSA more than surgical services. Importantly, approximately half of the respondents in surgery (48%) and obstetrics/gynecology/gynecologic oncology (46%) reported not routinely asking. Differences also existed by physician postgraduate year clinical training (FDR-adjusted-P = .005) with those with higher postgraduate year reporting they asked about OSA more often.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in screening by clinical roles and categories of care. This highlights the importance of improving provider education on the role of OSA in perioperative risk assessment and patient care.
CITATION: Lyons MM, Auckley DH, Mokhlesi B, et al. Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(5):765-773.
METHODS: Electronic-mail surveys were sent to physicians-in-training and APPs, in 5 categories of practice (anesthesiology, internal medicine, family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology/gynecologic oncology, and surgery) at 9 major institutions. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests evaluated associations between participant characteristics (clinical role, physician years of training, APP years of practice, categories of practice) and survey responses (perception of OSA, perioperative risk factor, screening/managing of perioperative OSA) stratified by institution. False discovery rate (FDR) adjustment accounted for multiple comparisons (FDR-adjusted-P values) of associations between multiple characteristics and a given response. Breslow-Day tests evaluated the homogeneity of odds ratios from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.
RESULTS: We received 2,236/6,724 (33.3%) responses. Almost all (97%) agreed OSA represents a risk factor for perioperative complications. Many (37.9%) were unaware which screening tool was used at their institution, with differences by clinical role (FDR-adjusted-P < .001), with APPs reporting not knowing more than residents and fellows, and across category of practice (FDR-adjusted-P < .001). While 66.5% routinely asked perioperative patients about signs/symptoms of OSA, 33.5% did not. There were differences by clinical role (FDR-adjusted-P < .001), as APPs reported asking about OSA more frequently than residents/fellows; and, by category of practice (FDR-adjusted-P < .001) as anesthesia and medical specialties reported asking about OSA more than surgical services. Importantly, approximately half of the respondents in surgery (48%) and obstetrics/gynecology/gynecologic oncology (46%) reported not routinely asking. Differences also existed by physician postgraduate year clinical training (FDR-adjusted-P = .005) with those with higher postgraduate year reporting they asked about OSA more often.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in screening by clinical roles and categories of care. This highlights the importance of improving provider education on the role of OSA in perioperative risk assessment and patient care.
CITATION: Lyons MM, Auckley DH, Mokhlesi B, et al. Physicians-in-training and advanced practice providers perceptions in managing perioperative obstructive sleep apnea: a multi-institutional survey. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025;21(5):765-773.