DOI 10.1016/j.jormas.2022.08.003
A detailed radiomorphometric analysis of the mandibular foramen, lingula and anti-lingula with a special emphasis on mandibular prognathism.
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study was to evaluate radiomorphometric differences of mandibular foramen (MF), lingula (Li), and anti-lingula (AL) between prognathic and non-prognathic patients, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
METHODS
A total of 228 3D CBCT images of 57 prognathic and 57 non-prognathic patients were retrospectively evaluated. The distances between MF or Li to occlusal plane (OP), anterior border of ramus (AR), posterior border of ramus (PR), sigmoid notch (SN), gonion (Go) and distances Li to MF were measured. The presence of AL, and the distances to Li were also assessed in both groups.
RESULTS
In prognathic patients the mean distances of MF-AR and Li-PR were lesser, and Li-OP was greater (p < 0.05). However, distances from MF or Li to the other ramal landmarks were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Presence of AL was found at 53 sides in prognathic and 20 sides in non-prognathic groups (p < 0.05). The horizontal distance of Li-MF was greater in prognathic patients (p < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no difference between groups regarding the horizontal distance of Li-Al, and the vertical distances of Li-MF and Li-AL (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The present study provided valuable data regarding morphological differences of MF-AR, Li-MF and Li-OP, which should be considered in the preoperative assessment of patients with mandibular prognathism. Presence of AL was more common in prognathic patients and mainly located above Li. 3D CBCT applications facilitated assessment of AL and its relationship with Li.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.