Laser thermal therapy: real-time MRI-guided and computer-controlled procedures for metastatic brain tumors.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE
We report the final results of a pilot clinical trial exploring the safety and feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance-guided laser-induced thermal therapy (MRgLITT) for treatment of resistant focal metastatic intracranial tumors.
STUDY
DESIGN
In patients with chemotherapy, whole-brain radiation, and radiosurgery resistant metastatic intracranial tumors, minimally invasive stereotaxic placement of a saline-cooled interstitial fiberoptic laser applicator under local anesthesia was followed by laser irradiation during continuous magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. A computer workstation extracted real-time temperature-sensitive information for feedback control over laser delivery. A total of 15 metastatic tumors were treated in 7 patients. Patients were followed with physical exam and imaging for 30 months.
RESULTS
In all cases, the procedure was well tolerated, and patients were discharged home within 24 hours. Follow-up imaging at up to 30 months showed an acute increase in apparent lesion volume followed by a gradual and steady decrease. No tumor recurrence within thermal ablation zones was noted. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the median survival was 19.8 months.
CONCLUSION
Real-time magnetic resonance (MR) guidance of laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) offers a high level of control. This tool therefore enables a minimally invasive option for destruction and treatment of resistant focal metastatic intracranial tumors. MR-guided LITT appears to provide a safe and potentially effective treatment for recurrent focal metastatic brain disease. A larger phase II and III series would be of interest to quantify potential median survival advantage.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.