Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology · 2026
Mapping the adoption trajectory, mobility independence, and social participation-wellbeing relationship of assistive technologies for persons with disabilities: a systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hendra Yustina Niken Raharina, Irawan Muhammad Zudhy, Parikesit Danang, Yunianti Nur Hadijah
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study analyse the adoption trajectory of assistive technology (AT) and its impacts on mobility independence and social participation-well-being among persons with disabilities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, 80 empirical articles (2015-2025) from Scopus and Web of Science were synthesised using a three-dimensional scoring system: (1) the adoption trajectory, (2) mobility independence and (3) social participation-well-being.
RESULTS: AT adoption correlates strongly with functional mobility (ρ = 0.70), but only moderately with well-being (ρ = 0.58). This gap indicates that technical efficacy requires contextual factors like inclusive policies and accessible infrastructure.
CONCLUSION: This article presents the Inclusive Mobility Impact Framework, a model detailing how long-term use of assistive technology gradually boosts functional mobility and social participation. The framework highlights multi-level strategies to support sustainable adoption and inclusive well-being outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following the PRISMA 2020 guideline, 80 empirical articles (2015-2025) from Scopus and Web of Science were synthesised using a three-dimensional scoring system: (1) the adoption trajectory, (2) mobility independence and (3) social participation-well-being.
RESULTS: AT adoption correlates strongly with functional mobility (ρ = 0.70), but only moderately with well-being (ρ = 0.58). This gap indicates that technical efficacy requires contextual factors like inclusive policies and accessible infrastructure.
CONCLUSION: This article presents the Inclusive Mobility Impact Framework, a model detailing how long-term use of assistive technology gradually boosts functional mobility and social participation. The framework highlights multi-level strategies to support sustainable adoption and inclusive well-being outcomes.