Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
Telehealth Delivery of Speech-Language Pathology Services for Children with Cleft Palate and Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Al Awaji Nisreen Naser, Alsinan Alanoud Nawaf, Alamri Raja S, Bin Ruaydan Nourah A, Alharbi Lama S, Albesher Lana T, Alrutaiq Latifa
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, caregiver satisfaction, and accessibility of telehealth-delivered speech-language pathology (SLP) services for children with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD).
METHODS: Based on PRISMA 2020, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library (2000-31 May 2025) for studies enrolling participants ≤ 18 years of age with cleft/VPD who received telehealth services (assessment, therapy, counseling/follow-up), with or without in-person comparators. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias was appraised using RoB 2 (randomized) and CASP checklists (non-randomized/service designs). To account for heterogeneity, we conducted a SWiM-aligned narrative synthesis and summarized certainty with GRADE.
RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Telehealth delivery of SLP services was feasible and generally acceptable to families. Caregiver-mediated interventions frequently showed within-group improvements in speech outcomes, while remote assessment demonstrated moderate agreement with in-person ratings. However, the overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low to low because of small sample sizes, single-center designs, and heterogeneous outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth is a feasible and acceptable mode for delivering SLP in pediatric cleft/VPD patients, with encouraging signals for caregiver-mediated articulation therapy and maintaining multidisciplinary follow-up. Implementation is best embedded within hybrid pathways, reserving in-person visits for complex assessments. Adequately powered comparative studies with standardized outcomes, longer follow-up, and equity-focused implementation are needed.
METHODS: Based on PRISMA 2020, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library (2000-31 May 2025) for studies enrolling participants ≤ 18 years of age with cleft/VPD who received telehealth services (assessment, therapy, counseling/follow-up), with or without in-person comparators. Screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Risk of bias was appraised using RoB 2 (randomized) and CASP checklists (non-randomized/service designs). To account for heterogeneity, we conducted a SWiM-aligned narrative synthesis and summarized certainty with GRADE.
RESULTS: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Telehealth delivery of SLP services was feasible and generally acceptable to families. Caregiver-mediated interventions frequently showed within-group improvements in speech outcomes, while remote assessment demonstrated moderate agreement with in-person ratings. However, the overall certainty of evidence was rated as very low to low because of small sample sizes, single-center designs, and heterogeneous outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth is a feasible and acceptable mode for delivering SLP in pediatric cleft/VPD patients, with encouraging signals for caregiver-mediated articulation therapy and maintaining multidisciplinary follow-up. Implementation is best embedded within hybrid pathways, reserving in-person visits for complex assessments. Adequately powered comparative studies with standardized outcomes, longer follow-up, and equity-focused implementation are needed.