MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01074.x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2010

Prescription trends for treatment of paediatric gastroenteritis at a Japanese hospital between 1997 and 2007.

Kita F, Shibata Y, Yorifuji T, Nakahata T, Kawakami J, Kawakami K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate recent trends in prescriptions for the treatment of paediatric gastroenteritis in Japan over a 10-year period (1997-2007).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data for 2295 prescriptions for 1241 putative cases of paediatric gastroenteritis, which were treated between 1997 and 2007 at Hamamatsu University Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.

RESULTS

The most frequently prescribed drugs were probiotics (n = 621), followed by anti-emetics (n = 474). In most years between 1997 and 2007, more cases were treated with probiotics than with any other drug type (30.6-63.3% of cases), with the percentage increasing between 2005 and 2007. In contrast, the frequencies of anti-emetic and antipyretic prescriptions remained fairly stable, and prescriptions for antibiotics decreased slightly over the study period. Anti-emetics were commonly used in this hospital.

CONCLUSION

Although experimental evidence upon which to base recommendations is lacking, Japanese evidence-based guidelines are critical for improving the quality of treatment of paediatric gastroenteritis.

Для цитирования: Kita F, Shibata Y, Yorifuji T, Nakahata T, Kawakami J, Kawakami K. Prescription trends for treatment of paediatric gastroenteritis at a Japanese hospital between 1997 and 2007.. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics. 2010. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01074.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.