MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.001

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2017

Is Concealed Epispadias a Rare Variant?

Shahat Ahmed, Safwat Ahmed S, Elderwy Ahmad, Abdelkawi Islam F, Abonnoor Ahmad Elbadry I, Abdelhafez Mohamed F, Moeen Ahmed, Hammouda Hisham

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience with concealed epispadias and to estimate its actual share in the isolated male epispadias cases and its effect on the surgical outcome.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Consecutive patients with isolated male epispadias treated in our center between 2008 and 2015 were classified into concealed and classic epispadias. The 2 groups were compared regarding age at presentation, meatal location, incontinence, dorsal curvature, success rate, and complications.

RESULTS

Out of 51 patients with isolated male epispadias, 11 (21.6%) were concealed: 7 balanic and 4 penile shaft epispadias. Concealed epispadias cases were found to have significantly delayed age at presentation, more distal meatal location, and less incontinence rate than classic epispadias cases. None of the surgical outcome parameters showed significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Concealed epispadias represents about one-fifth of isolated male epispadias cases. Impediment and delay of diagnosis are its main clinical impacts, with insignificant effect on the surgical outcome.

Для цитирования: Shahat Ahmed, Safwat Ahmed S, Elderwy Ahmad, Abdelkawi Islam F, Abonnoor Ahmad Elbadry I, Abdelhafez Mohamed F, Moeen Ahmed, Hammouda Hisham. Is Concealed Epispadias a Rare Variant?. Urology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.