m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
JACC. Clinical electrophysiology · 2026

Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy in Women.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Garcia Rodrigue, Kerkouri Fawzi, Marquié Christelle, Ait Said Mina, Anselme Frédéric, Aoudjeghout Warda, Badenco Nicolas, Badoz Marc, Barra Sergio, Barthez Olivier, Blangy Hugues, Bordachar Pierre, Champ-Rigot Laure, Combes Stéphane, Defaye Pascal, Deharo Jean Claude, Gandjbakhch Estelle, Gitenay Edouard, Gorka Hervé, Heurtebise Isabelle, Hourdain Jérôme, Jesel Laurence, Khris Lila, Lebon Alain, Leclercq Christophe, Le Page Sophie, Mechulan Alexis, Mondoly Pierre, Pasquié Jean-Luc, Perrot David, Pierre Bertrand, Piot Olivier, Quentin Anne, Rendu Eric, Villejoubert Olivier, Waldmann Victor, Weizman Orianne, Probst Vincent, Boveda Serge, Marijon Eloi, HONEST Investigators

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an established therapy for sudden cardiac death prevention, but sex-specific outcomes remain incompletely characterized.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated sex-related differences in baseline characteristics, appropriate shocks, complications, reinterventions, and mortality among S-ICD recipients.

METHODS: The nationwide HONEST (S-ICD French Cohort Study) cohort enrolled all patients who received an S-ICD in France between 2012 and 2019. Clinical endpoints were centrally adjudicated. Sex-specific associations with outcomes were assessed by using propensity score-based inverse probability weighting.

RESULTS: Among 4,924 S-ICD recipients, 1,148 were women (23.3%). Compared with men, women were younger (47.3 ± 15.6 years vs 50.6 ± 14.7 years; P < 0.001), less frequently received an implant for primary prevention (57.6% vs 65.1%; P < 0.001), less often had coronary artery disease (38.9% vs 56.5%; P < 0.001), and more often had electrical heart disease (26.3% vs 20.4%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, women had a lower 5-year risk of appropriate shocks (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.98; P = 0.023) and similar overall complication and reintervention rates but a distinct complication profile, with higher risks of chronic pain (HR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.61-4.29; P < 0.001) and lead dislodgment (HR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.09-2.95; P = 0.022) and a lower risk of inappropriate shocks (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.50-0.82; P < 0.001). All-cause mortality was lower in women, whereas S-ICD-unresponsive sudden death and device-related mortality were similar.

CONCLUSIONS: Women receiving an S-ICD experienced fewer appropriate shocks, with similar overall complication and reintervention rates, but a distinct complication profile. These findings support sex-informed S-ICD selection and follow-up. (S-ICD French Cohort Study [HONEST]; NCT05302115).

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты