DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.042
Effect of Combining Intrauterine Cerebral Blood Flow Changes with Electrical Activity on Prognostic Evaluation of Brain Injury.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
We sought to investigate the value of combining intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes with brain electrical activity examination in evaluating the prognosis of brain injury.
METHODS
A total of 90 preterm infants were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: the brain damaged preterm infants group (n = 55) and the nonbrain damaged preterm infants group (n = 35). The diagnostic efficacy of combining intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes with electroencephalogram (EEG) activity examination in predicting the prognosis of preterm infants with brain injury was evaluated using T-test. Pearson linear correlation was applied to analyze the relationship between fetal intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes combined with electrical activity examination and the prognosis of brain injury.
RESULTS
Significant differences were seen in pulse index, the ratio of peak systolic velocity to end diastolic velocity ratio, and other indexes between the 2 groups (P < 0.05). The combined approach of intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes with EEG activity examination demonstrated significantly higher values for area under the curve, sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to using intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes or EEG activity examination alone (P < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between fetal intrauterine cerebral blood flow and electrical activity examination (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Combining the assessment of intrauterine cerebral blood flow changes with cerebral electrical activity examination proved beneficial in diagnosing the prognosis of brain injury and provided an important reference for early clinical intervention.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.