Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2018
Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension: The Mulayim Technique.
СтатьяVideo-Audio MediaНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mulayim Baris, Sendag Fatih
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a modified technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
DESIGN: A video illustrating this modified technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension (Canadian Task Force classification III).
SETTING: The benign gynecology department at a university hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic lateral suspension using mesh is a minimally invasive technique that effectively treats POP [1-4]. We present a modified technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension that differs from previously described methods [1-4]. The prominent differences are as follows: first, our modified technique uses Mersilene tape on a 48-mm round-bodied needle (Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ,USA). We suspend the vaginal vault, taking a double bite using Mersilene tape without knotting placed as a transversal hammock. Thanks to the Mersilene tape, meshes, sutures, tackers, or fasteners are not needed. Mersilene tape ensures much easier suturing and an inexpensive artificial material. The second difference is that port placement sites (Fig. 1). The third difference is the number of incisions we make (Fig. 1). We do not need 2 additional incisions as used in previously described methods references [1-4]. We use the same incision for lateral trocar insertion and for pulling out the distal end of the Mersilene tape, which is 2 cm above the iliac crest and 4 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 1). Our technique has the potential to be easier, shorter, more cost-efficient, less invasive, and safer when compared with previously described methods.
CONCLUSION: Modified laparoscopic lateral suspension, the so-called Mulayim technique, might be considered as an alternative treatment for POP surgery; however, studies should be conducted in a larger number of patients with longer postoperative follow-up periods (Fig. 1).
DESIGN: A video illustrating this modified technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension (Canadian Task Force classification III).
SETTING: The benign gynecology department at a university hospital.
INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic lateral suspension using mesh is a minimally invasive technique that effectively treats POP [1-4]. We present a modified technique of laparoscopic lateral suspension that differs from previously described methods [1-4]. The prominent differences are as follows: first, our modified technique uses Mersilene tape on a 48-mm round-bodied needle (Ethicon Inc, Somerville, NJ,USA). We suspend the vaginal vault, taking a double bite using Mersilene tape without knotting placed as a transversal hammock. Thanks to the Mersilene tape, meshes, sutures, tackers, or fasteners are not needed. Mersilene tape ensures much easier suturing and an inexpensive artificial material. The second difference is that port placement sites (Fig. 1). The third difference is the number of incisions we make (Fig. 1). We do not need 2 additional incisions as used in previously described methods references [1-4]. We use the same incision for lateral trocar insertion and for pulling out the distal end of the Mersilene tape, which is 2 cm above the iliac crest and 4 cm posterior to the anterior superior iliac spine (Fig. 1). Our technique has the potential to be easier, shorter, more cost-efficient, less invasive, and safer when compared with previously described methods.
CONCLUSION: Modified laparoscopic lateral suspension, the so-called Mulayim technique, might be considered as an alternative treatment for POP surgery; however, studies should be conducted in a larger number of patients with longer postoperative follow-up periods (Fig. 1).