MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000037073

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2024

Co-infection of Nocardia and Aspergillus fumigatus in a immunosuppressed patient: Case report.

Wang Lei, Liu Yang, Li Hui

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nocardia and Aspergillus fumigatus are opportunistic pathogenic fungus that has a major impact on the mortality of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients present diagnostic challenges. Nocardia and A fumigatus are both easily overlooked because of their rarity, leading to delayed diagnosis and treatment.

CASE PRESENTATION: We report an infection caused by steroid use in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. A 76-year-old man with a history of rheumatoid arthritis was admitted to our hospital because of cough, expectoration and fever for 10 days. The patient had low immune function, granulocytopenia, diffuse infiltration could be seen on chest computed tomography, and BAL fluid galactomannan level of 1.3 S/CO. The microbiological findings reflect a possible co-infection with Nocardia and A fumigatus. Voriconazole was used to treat pulmonary aspergillosis, ceftriaxone and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole were used to treat Nocardia. After timely targeted medication administration, the patient was discharged with a good prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Co-infection is more common in immunosuppressed patients and warrants attention in clinical practice. Early diagnosis and treatment can help patients with Co-infection of Nocardia and A fumigatus achieve better prognosis.

Для цитирования: Wang Lei, Liu Yang, Li Hui. Co-infection of Nocardia and Aspergillus fumigatus in a immunosuppressed patient: Case report.. Medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037073.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.