MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3233/shti260703

Медицинская библиотека · Studies in health technology and informatics · 2026

Harnessing Patient-Generated Data for Rare Disease Knowledge Enrichment: A Pilot Study.

Hui Selina Wai Yan, Chen Fangyi, Wang Kai, Weng Chunhua

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Patients with rare diseases often endure a 4-5-year diagnostic odyssey. Patient-generated data on social media remains an untapped resource for understanding rare diseases. This study characterizes patient descriptions of rare disease from social media and systematically compares patient-reported symptoms to literature-documented ones. 166 unique rare diseases were identified from 229 patient posts. A hybrid human-AI framework using GPT-4 with full manual verification was used to extract and standardize patient-reported symptoms, which were then compared against symptoms documented in PubMed. The most frequent patient-reported symptoms were motor impairment, ataxia, pain, and fatigue. A low average overlap was observed between patient-reported symptoms and clinical literature. Patient narratives emphasized quality-of-life impacts (e.g., fatigue, anxiety), whereas clinical literature focused on diagnostic markers (e.g., dysarthria, dysphagia). Patient-generated data reveals underreported symptoms that are particularly meaningful to patients and complement clinical findings. Harnessing these real-world insights holds immense potential to shorten the diagnostic odyssey, inform patient-centered care, and guide future research priorities for rare diseases.

Для цитирования: Hui Selina Wai Yan, Chen Fangyi, Wang Kai, Weng Chunhua. Harnessing Patient-Generated Data for Rare Disease Knowledge Enrichment: A Pilot Study.. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2026. DOI: 10.3233/shti260703.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.