MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.67651

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Unusual Association of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Bladder and Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Within a 76-Year-Old Man.

Nassira Karich, Aberkane Mahmoud, El Moudane Anouar, Haloui Anass, Bennani Amal

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is one of the rarest types of bladder cancer, with an aggressive course and a poor prognosis. We report a case of LCNEC of the bladder associated with a prostatic adenocarcinoma. A very rare association, to our knowledge, is described for the first time in the literature. The patient was a 76-year-old non-smoker male, who presented with intermittent hematuria and dysuria. Cystoscopy revealed a lesion on the right lateral bladder wall. Biopsy was in favor of a LCNEC with muscle invasion. The CT scan showed the presence of a second lesion in the prostate, confirmed by histological examination. The patient was treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy of the cisplatin-etoposide type for large-cell bladder neuroendocrine carcinoma, and hormone therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) analogs for prostatic adenocarcinoma, followed by radical surgery. Given the rarity of this tumor, LCNEC treatment lacks precision. Many cases are published with different therapeutic strategies. A literature review would be interesting to codify the therapeutic strategy for this rare tumor.

Для цитирования: Nassira Karich, Aberkane Mahmoud, El Moudane Anouar, Haloui Anass, Bennani Amal. Unusual Association of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Bladder and Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Within a 76-Year-Old Man.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67651.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.