Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2013
Elevated umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio in the absence of fetal growth restriction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Filmar Gilad, Panagopoulos Georgia, Minior Victoria, Barnhard Yoni, Divon Michael Y
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether patients with isolated elevation of umbilical artery (UA) systolic/diastolic (S/D) ratio are at increased risk for adverse perinatal outcome.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 330 patients who underwent routine evaluation at our maternal fetal medicine center. We regularly perform UA S/D ratio analysis with every third trimester sonogram. All identified patients were included and divided into four groups based on estimated fetal weight (EFW) and UA S/D ratio. Perinatal outcome was compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Regardless of the EFW, fetuses with persistent elevated UA S/D ratio showed significantly more preterm deliveries (p < .001), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (p < .001), longer stay in the NICU (p < .001) and lower birth weight (p < .001) relative to controls. Stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that being a member in any study group significantly and independently predicted birth weight less than the 10th percentile and preterm delivery. Patients with persistently elevated S/D ratio were significantly and independently from other factors, more likely to have a newborn admitted to the NICU.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a suboptimal perinatal outcome in all pregnancies with an elevated UA S/D ratio. These fetuses may benefit from intensive monitoring.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 330 patients who underwent routine evaluation at our maternal fetal medicine center. We regularly perform UA S/D ratio analysis with every third trimester sonogram. All identified patients were included and divided into four groups based on estimated fetal weight (EFW) and UA S/D ratio. Perinatal outcome was compared between the groups.
RESULTS: Regardless of the EFW, fetuses with persistent elevated UA S/D ratio showed significantly more preterm deliveries (p < .001), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions (p < .001), longer stay in the NICU (p < .001) and lower birth weight (p < .001) relative to controls. Stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that being a member in any study group significantly and independently predicted birth weight less than the 10th percentile and preterm delivery. Patients with persistently elevated S/D ratio were significantly and independently from other factors, more likely to have a newborn admitted to the NICU.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate a suboptimal perinatal outcome in all pregnancies with an elevated UA S/D ratio. These fetuses may benefit from intensive monitoring.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultBirth WeightBlood Flow VelocityConfidence IntervalsFemaleFetal Growth RetardationFetal WeightHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalLength of StayOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPremature BirthRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalUmbilical Arteries