The Prevalence of Central Sleep Apnea in New Referrals to a Sleep Surgery Clinic.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Surgical treatment of non-obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) pathology poses the risk of inappropriate surgical indications. Herein, we sought to determine the prevalence of non-OSA respiratory disorders, specifically central sleep apnea (CSA), in new referrals to a Sleep Surgery Clinic.
STUDY
DESIGN
Prospective observational review.
SETTING
Tertiary care academic medical center.
METHODS
In a sleep surgery clinic cohort, the presence of clinically significant CSA was defined as having >25% of the total apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) being central and/or mixed events. Demographics, comorbid disorders, patient-reported outcome measurements, and sleep study results were compared among patients using linear or logistic regression analysis, unadjusted and adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI).
RESULTS
On average, the cohort (n = 295) was male (74%), middle-aged (mean [±SD] 54.2 ± 13.9 years), and overweight (BMI 30.3 ± 5.4), with severe sleep apnea (AHI 30.6 ± 22.6 events/h). Twenty-nine patients (9.8%) were found to have clinically significant CSA yet only 10% of these cases carried a diagnosis of CSA upon presentation. The remainder were identified by reviewing the pre-visit sleep study tables (35%), raw data (17%), and tables and raw data of a repeat post-visit study (38%). Patients with CSA were older and had evidence of more cardiac comorbidities.
CONCLUSION
The prevalence of CSA in new referrals to a Sleep Surgery Clinic was nearly 1 in 10 despite only 1% (3 of 295) with a known diagnosis upon presentation. Sleep surgeons must remain vigilant for patients with occult CSA, especially in older patients with a history of significant cardiovascular disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.