MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40199-026-00590-5

Медицинская библиотека · Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026

Comparative efficacy of obicetrapib and anacetrapib in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Jaber Abdel Rahman, Abu Zayed Jihad, Alabed Zaid, Zapen Ja'far, Ayesh Hazem

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors, specifically anacetrapib and obicetrapib, have shown strong lipid-modifying effects by lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and altering other lipid parameters. However, comparative evidence on their relative efficacy and safety is limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of anacetrapib and obicetrapib.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The protocol was registered at OSF ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/VRP8Y ). The primary outcome was change in LDL-C; secondary outcomes included high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), apolipoprotein AI (ApoAI), apolipoprotein E (ApoE), incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuation. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using the netmeta package in R, with placebo as reference.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials (2,937 patients) were included. Obicetrapib showed the most significant reduction in LDL-C (MD -33.63 mg/dL; 95% CI [-44.10, -23.16]) and the most significant increase in HDL-C (MD 154.33 mg/dL; 95% CI [132.73, 175.93]), outperforming anacetrapib. Both drugs comparably reduced non-HDL-C, ApoB, and Lp(a). Obicetrapib was associated with greater increases in ApoA1 and ApoE, while anacetrapib lowered triglycerides more effectively. Obicetrapib had the lowest risk of overall adverse events (RR 0.69; 95% CI [0.49, 0.99]) and ranked favorably for serious adverse events and discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Both agents effectively reduced LDL-C levels, with obicetrapib demonstrating superior efficacy compared to anacetrapib. Additionally, both treatments demonstrated favorable safety profiles. These findings underscore the potential of CETP inhibitors as promising therapeutic options for patients with dyslipidemia.

Для цитирования: Jaber Abdel Rahman, Abu Zayed Jihad, Alabed Zaid, Zapen Ja'far, Ayesh Hazem. Comparative efficacy of obicetrapib and anacetrapib in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels: a network meta-analysis of clinical trials.. Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2026. DOI: 10.1007/s40199-026-00590-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.