Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026
Elastase-Treated Auricular Cartilage: Feasibility as a Substitute for Native Tarsus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Meer Elana, Goodyear Kendall, Park Joseph, Jafari Somaye, Mirchia Kanish, Demer Joseph, Karlin Justin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Reconstruction of upper eyelid defects is challenging due to paucity of fungible local tissue and a lack of adequate tarsal substitutes. Cartilage is too stiff to be directly implanted in the posterior lamella due to the risk of corneal damage with blinking. Since elastin is a key structural element in elastic cartilage, the authors hypothesized that elastase treatment of cartilage may reduce cartilage's stiffness sufficiently to make it a feasible posterior eyelid lamella substitute.
METHODS: Porcine auricular cartilage was treated with elastase or buffer control. Histopathology, electron microscopy, and mechanical testing were performed. Young's modulus was calculated using the Hertzian method for mechanical indentation testing at baseline, 2, and 24 hours. Group 1 (buffer control auricular cartilage), Group 2 (elastase-treated auricular cartilage), and Group 3 (native tarsus) were compared.
RESULTS: Grossly, elastase treatment increased cartilage flexibility, and microscopically increased chondrocyte lacunae and decreased the density of the interterritorial matrix, relative to controls. Electron microscopy revealed elastin fiber degradation with empty channels preplacing elastin fibers. At 2 hours, cartilage stiffness showed minimal differences between Groups 1 and 2 for both instantaneous modulus (1.34 vs. 1.37 MPa; p = 0.92) and equilibrium modulus (0.31 vs. 0.36 MPa; p = 0.71). By 24 hours, the equilibrium modulus of elastase-treated cartilage (0.055 MPa) resembled native tarsus (0.016 MPa; p = 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Grossly, elastase treatment increased cartilage flexibility and, microscopically, increased chondrocyte lacunae and decreased the density of the interterritorial matrix, relative to controls.
METHODS: Porcine auricular cartilage was treated with elastase or buffer control. Histopathology, electron microscopy, and mechanical testing were performed. Young's modulus was calculated using the Hertzian method for mechanical indentation testing at baseline, 2, and 24 hours. Group 1 (buffer control auricular cartilage), Group 2 (elastase-treated auricular cartilage), and Group 3 (native tarsus) were compared.
RESULTS: Grossly, elastase treatment increased cartilage flexibility, and microscopically increased chondrocyte lacunae and decreased the density of the interterritorial matrix, relative to controls. Electron microscopy revealed elastin fiber degradation with empty channels preplacing elastin fibers. At 2 hours, cartilage stiffness showed minimal differences between Groups 1 and 2 for both instantaneous modulus (1.34 vs. 1.37 MPa; p = 0.92) and equilibrium modulus (0.31 vs. 0.36 MPa; p = 0.71). By 24 hours, the equilibrium modulus of elastase-treated cartilage (0.055 MPa) resembled native tarsus (0.016 MPa; p = 0.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Grossly, elastase treatment increased cartilage flexibility and, microscopically, increased chondrocyte lacunae and decreased the density of the interterritorial matrix, relative to controls.