Aging clinical and experimental research · 2011
Clinical and forensic medicine issues in osteoporosis fractures.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oh C, Rengelshausen J, Mangold B, Etropolski M, Rauschkolb C, Wang S S, Upmalis D, Häufel T
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare 90-day perioperative complications and pathological outcomes between laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and extraperitoneal radical cystectomy (EORC) approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All operations were performed in a single high-volume tertiary referee center by the same surgical team.Males ≥ 18 years with pre-cystectomy clinical T1-T3 disease and having undergone an ileal conduit were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previous pelvic and/or abdominal irradiation, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or clinical T4 disease. Perioperative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and 90-day complications were evaluated. The recovery duration of regular bowel activity, mean stool passage,and ileus rates were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 221 patients met the inclusion criteria(81 LRC and 130 EORC). Demographics and preoperative parameters were comparable. Intraoperative estimated blood lossfavored LRC by a median of 450 mL (200-900) P=.021) vs. a median of 700 mL (300-2900) for EORC. The transfusion rate did not differ between the two groups; %14.8 (N=12) for the LRC and %20.8 (N=27) for EORC (P=.37). The median hospital stay was 9 (4-49) days for EORC and 8 (4-29) days for LRC (P=.011). The need for analgesics to control pain through an epidural catheter was higher for EORC (P=.042). There was no difference in overall complication rates (P=.47).
CONCLUSION: Although LRC appears to have a slight advantage over EORC, both techniques yield satisfactory results in regard to ileus rates and 90-day perioperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All operations were performed in a single high-volume tertiary referee center by the same surgical team.Males ≥ 18 years with pre-cystectomy clinical T1-T3 disease and having undergone an ileal conduit were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previous pelvic and/or abdominal irradiation, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or clinical T4 disease. Perioperative outcomes such as operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, hospital stay, and 90-day complications were evaluated. The recovery duration of regular bowel activity, mean stool passage,and ileus rates were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 221 patients met the inclusion criteria(81 LRC and 130 EORC). Demographics and preoperative parameters were comparable. Intraoperative estimated blood lossfavored LRC by a median of 450 mL (200-900) P=.021) vs. a median of 700 mL (300-2900) for EORC. The transfusion rate did not differ between the two groups; %14.8 (N=12) for the LRC and %20.8 (N=27) for EORC (P=.37). The median hospital stay was 9 (4-49) days for EORC and 8 (4-29) days for LRC (P=.011). The need for analgesics to control pain through an epidural catheter was higher for EORC (P=.042). There was no difference in overall complication rates (P=.47).
CONCLUSION: Although LRC appears to have a slight advantage over EORC, both techniques yield satisfactory results in regard to ileus rates and 90-day perioperative complications.