MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.034

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2010

Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of the efficacy of the Prolift system for pelvic organ prolapse.

Kasturi Seshadri, Lowman Joye K, Kelvin Frederick M, Akisik Fatih M, Terry Colin L, Hale Douglass S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare pre- and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements in patients who undergo total Prolift (Ethicon, Inc, Somerville, NJ) colpopexy.

STUDY

DESIGN

Pre- and postoperative MRI and POP-Q examinations were performed on patients with stage 2 or greater prolapse who underwent the Prolift procedure. MRI measurements were taken at maximum descent. Correlations between changes in MRI and POP-Q measurements were determined.

RESULTS

Ten subjects were enrolled. On MRI, statistically significant changes were seen with cystocele, enterocele, and apex. Statistically significant changes were seen on POP-Q measurements for Aa, Ba, C, Ap, Bp, and GH. Positive correlations were demonstrated between POP-Q and MRI changes. Minimal tissue reaction was seen on MRI.

CONCLUSION

The Prolift system is effective in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse as measured by POP-Q and MRI. Postoperative MRIs support the inert nature of polypropylene mesh.

Для цитирования: Kasturi Seshadri, Lowman Joye K, Kelvin Frederick M, Akisik Fatih M, Terry Colin L, Hale Douglass S. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of the efficacy of the Prolift system for pelvic organ prolapse.. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.034.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.