MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90248-5

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of surgery · 1986

A saphenous alternative: preferential use of superficial femoral and popliteal veins as femoropopliteal bypass grafts.

Schulman M L, Badhey M R, Yatco R, Pillari G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Our experience with 100 superficial femoral and popliteal veins over a 12 year period has established a firm basis for their preferential use as femoropopliteal bypass grafts. Deep leg veins are currently used in two thirds of primary femoropopliteal bypass candidates. Groups identifiable preoperatively in whom results have been inferior include patients with excessively large grafts, black patients, and those with extremely poor runoff. Patients who will develop distal anastomotic hyperplasia, a fourth problem group, cannot be detected preoperatively but can be diagnosed and managed effectively. Disadvantages of superficial femoral and popliteal vein use include longer and more traumatic operations, increased early limb swelling, and the need for preoperative venography and postoperative arteriography to achieve optimum results. The most important advantage of preferential deep leg vein use is the high patency rate at 2 years with the expectation, already being realized, of significantly reduced intrinsic graft failures in the later years. Saphenous vein preservation constitutes a major additional bonus.

Для цитирования: Schulman M L, Badhey M R, Yatco R, Pillari G. A saphenous alternative: preferential use of superficial femoral and popliteal veins as femoropopliteal bypass grafts.. American journal of surgery. 1986. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90248-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.