MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/sxmrev/qead039

Медицинская библиотека · Sexual medicine reviews · 2023

Not all lasers are the same: a scoping review evaluating laser therapy for vulvodynia.

Starzec-Proserpio Małgorzata, Bardin Marcela Grigol, Morin Melanie

СтатьяScoping ReviewПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Lasers are commonly used for treating various vaginal/vulvar conditions. To date, there is to our knowledge no available literature review on the effects of different types of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia, a condition that causes chronic pain in the vulvar area.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to review the literature and summarize the existing published evidence regarding the effects of lasers for the treatment of women with vulvodynia.

METHODS

A scoping review with a systematic search was conducted that included studies investigating the use of laser treatment in women with vulvodynia. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools were used for the quality assessment. The type of laser, effects on pain and function, and participants' perceived improvement as well as adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eight studies investigating laser therapy were included in the analysis: 1 randomized controlled trial, 5 before-after studies, 1 nonrandomized intervention study, and 1 case report. Several types of laser therapies were identified, ranging from mild noninvasive photobiomodulation to more invasive ablative procedures. Of the 6 studies that included pain outcomes, 3 studies showed statistically significant improvements from baseline to follow-up, and 3 demonstrated a reduction in pain from subjectively interpreted data. Similarly, each of the 2 studies investigating sexual function also reported an improvement (based only on subjective interpretation). Of the 2 studies with a comparison group, neither study was adequately powered to detect between-group differences. Furthermore, 57%-78% of participants reported improvement, with 1 study showing a greater statistically significant improvement in the low-level laser therapy patient group compared to the sham laser group. Outcomes and adverse events varied depending on the type of laser used.

CONCLUSIONS

Although these studies demonstrated some benefits of laser therapy for the treatment of vulvodynia, these findings should be interpreted with caution given the scarcity of the included studies that were robust and sufficiently powered. Future research should focus on conducting well-designed randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of different types of lasers in the treatment of vulvodynia.

Для цитирования: Starzec-Proserpio Małgorzata, Bardin Marcela Grigol, Morin Melanie. Not all lasers are the same: a scoping review evaluating laser therapy for vulvodynia.. Sexual medicine reviews. 2023. DOI: 10.1093/sxmrev/qead039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.