Annals of internal medicine · 2026
Reporting Interest-Holder Engagement in Practice Guidelines: The RIGHT-MuSE Checklist.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yu Xuan, Zeidan Lili, Khabsa Joanne, Petkovic Jennifer, Agoritsas Thomas, Bou Akl Imad, Al-Ansary Lubna A, Amer Yasser Sami, Ben Brahem Asma, Chang Stephanie, Concannon Thomas, Florez Ivan D, Jameleddine Mouna, Lytvyn Lyubov, Marušić Ana, McCaul Michael, Moja Lorenzo, Naude Celeste, Palm Marisha, Pardo Pardo Jordi, Saginur Michael, Thomas Rebekah, Tovey David, Ziganshina Liliya Eugenevna, Tugwell Peter, Welch Vivian, Estill Janne, Bian Zhaoxiang, Chen Yaolong, Akl Elie A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: As part of the development of practice guidelines, developers need to systematically engage relevant interest-holder groups. The Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist for reporting practice guidelines lacks detailed guidance on how to report the engagement process.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized checklist for reporting interest-holder engagement in practice guidelines, named the RIGHT-MuSE checklist.
DESIGN: The development process followed the methods recommended by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network, as well as lessons learned from the development of the RIGHT statement and its extensions. Key steps included developing the protocol, registering the project, establishing a working group, conducting background work, generating an initial list of items, conducting a consensus survey, holding panel discussions, and creating the final RIGHT-MuSE checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document.
SETTING: International collaboration.
PARTICIPANTS: 25 panelists from various guideline development interest-holder groups.
MEASUREMENTS: Consensus agreement on checklist items.
RESULTS: The final RIGHT-MuSE checklist consists of 11 items covering the guidance used, methods of engagement, characteristics of interest-holders, evaluation of engagement, and management of conflicts of interest. The checklist is supplemented with a glossary of key terms and detailed explanations for each item to facilitate its use.
LIMITATION: The RIGHT-MuSE checklist has not been evaluated in a broader context or widely applied in real-world guideline development processes.
CONCLUSION: Guideline developers can use the RIGHT-MuSE checklist to comprehensively report on interest-holder engagement.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Vincent and Lily Woo Foundation.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a standardized checklist for reporting interest-holder engagement in practice guidelines, named the RIGHT-MuSE checklist.
DESIGN: The development process followed the methods recommended by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network, as well as lessons learned from the development of the RIGHT statement and its extensions. Key steps included developing the protocol, registering the project, establishing a working group, conducting background work, generating an initial list of items, conducting a consensus survey, holding panel discussions, and creating the final RIGHT-MuSE checklist and an accompanying explanation and elaboration document.
SETTING: International collaboration.
PARTICIPANTS: 25 panelists from various guideline development interest-holder groups.
MEASUREMENTS: Consensus agreement on checklist items.
RESULTS: The final RIGHT-MuSE checklist consists of 11 items covering the guidance used, methods of engagement, characteristics of interest-holders, evaluation of engagement, and management of conflicts of interest. The checklist is supplemented with a glossary of key terms and detailed explanations for each item to facilitate its use.
LIMITATION: The RIGHT-MuSE checklist has not been evaluated in a broader context or widely applied in real-world guideline development processes.
CONCLUSION: Guideline developers can use the RIGHT-MuSE checklist to comprehensively report on interest-holder engagement.
PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: The Vincent and Lily Woo Foundation.