The Journal of reproductive medicine · 1996
Euprolactinemic Galactorrhea. Response of bioassayable prolactin to thyrotropin-releasing hormone.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ataya K M, Subramanian M G, Lawson D M, Gala R R
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To define whether the pathophysiology of euprolactinemic galactorrhea (EuG) involves hyperresponsiveness to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH).
STUDY DESIGN: Basal and TRH-induced prolactin (PRL) patterns were examined in women with EuG (n = 7) and compared to those in controls (n = 10) with normal menstrual cycles. PRL activity was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and Nb2 lymphoma cell bioassay (BA). The response of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL, the BA/RIA-PRL ratio and lactogenic activity to TRH given intravenously were studied.
RESULTS: The response of RIA-PRL, BA-PRL, lactogenic activity (representing both PRL and growth hormone in the Nb2 lymphoma cell bioassay) and BA/RIA-PRL ratio were not significantly different in EuG as compared to controls. In both groups the combined BA/ RIA-PRL ratio increased at 15 (P = .006), 30 (P = .011), and 90 minutes (P = .022) after TRH injection as compared to zero time. The level of serum progesterone at the time of TRH stimulation did not affect the response of any parameter studied.
CONCLUSION: The response of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL and the BA/RIA-PRL ratio to TRH was not significantly different in EuG as compared to controls. The mechanism of EuG did not involve hyperresponsiveness of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL, the BA/RIA-PRL ratio or lactogenic activity to TRH.
STUDY DESIGN: Basal and TRH-induced prolactin (PRL) patterns were examined in women with EuG (n = 7) and compared to those in controls (n = 10) with normal menstrual cycles. PRL activity was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and Nb2 lymphoma cell bioassay (BA). The response of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL, the BA/RIA-PRL ratio and lactogenic activity to TRH given intravenously were studied.
RESULTS: The response of RIA-PRL, BA-PRL, lactogenic activity (representing both PRL and growth hormone in the Nb2 lymphoma cell bioassay) and BA/RIA-PRL ratio were not significantly different in EuG as compared to controls. In both groups the combined BA/ RIA-PRL ratio increased at 15 (P = .006), 30 (P = .011), and 90 minutes (P = .022) after TRH injection as compared to zero time. The level of serum progesterone at the time of TRH stimulation did not affect the response of any parameter studied.
CONCLUSION: The response of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL and the BA/RIA-PRL ratio to TRH was not significantly different in EuG as compared to controls. The mechanism of EuG did not involve hyperresponsiveness of BA-PRL, RIA-PRL, the BA/RIA-PRL ratio or lactogenic activity to TRH.