Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy · 2026
Relationship of wound cosmesis with patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Masuda Sho, Minoda Yukihide, Ueyama Hideki, Ohyama Yohei, Sugama Ryo, Terai Hidetomi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although a few studies have assessed cosmetic outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA), none have investigated their association with hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cosmetic outcomes and PROMs following THA.
METHODS: We included 139 cases of primary THAs for osteoarthritis of the hip with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) from the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. PROMs were assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). Correlations between cosmetic outcomes and PROMs were analysed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period after THA was 24 months. The PSAS total score was negatively correlated with the FJS-12 total score (r = -0.430, p < 0.001) and JHEQ total score (r = -0.243, p = 0.004). Among the JHEQ subscales, negative correlations were observed with the pain (r = -0.221, p = 0.009) and mental (r = -0.288, p < 0.001) subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: Better cosmetic outcomes were associated with better PROMs after THA. However, the direction and clinical importance of the association remain unclear and warrant further investigation.
METHODS: We included 139 cases of primary THAs for osteoarthritis of the hip with a follow-up period of at least 1 year. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) from the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. PROMs were assessed using the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ). Correlations between cosmetic outcomes and PROMs were analysed.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period after THA was 24 months. The PSAS total score was negatively correlated with the FJS-12 total score (r = -0.430, p < 0.001) and JHEQ total score (r = -0.243, p = 0.004). Among the JHEQ subscales, negative correlations were observed with the pain (r = -0.221, p = 0.009) and mental (r = -0.288, p < 0.001) subscales.
CONCLUSIONS: Better cosmetic outcomes were associated with better PROMs after THA. However, the direction and clinical importance of the association remain unclear and warrant further investigation.