MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2021

Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.

Blauth Michael, Joeris Alexander, Rometsch Elke, Espinoza-Rebmann Kathrin, Wattanapanom Pannida, Jarayabhand Rahat, Poeze Martijn, Wong Merng K, Kwek Ernest B K, Hegeman Johannes H, Perez-Uribarri Carlos, Guerado Enrique, Revak Thomas J, Zohner Sebastian, Joseph David, Gosch Markus

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of treatment in geriatric fracture centres (GFC) on the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) in patients with hip fractures compared with usual care centres (UCC). Secondary objectives included hospital-workflow and mobility-related outcomes.

DESIGN

Cohort study recruiting patients between June 2015 and January 2017. Follow-up was 1 year.

SETTING

International (six countries, three continents) multicentre study.

PARTICIPANTS

281 patients aged ≥70 with operatively treated proximal femur fractures.

INTERVENTIONS: Treatment in UCCs (n=139) or GFCs (n=142), that is, interdisciplinary treatment including regular geriatric consultation and daily physiotherapy.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was occurrence of prespecified MAEs, including delirium. Secondary outcomes included any other adverse events, time to surgery, time in acute ward, 1-year mortality, mobility, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Patients treated in GFCs (n=142) had a mean age of 81.9 (SD, 6.6) years versus 83.9 (SD 6.9) years in patients (n=139) treated in UCCs (p=0.013) and a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2.0 (SD, 2.1) versus 1.2 (SD, 1.5) in UCCs (p=0.001). More patients in GFCs (28.2%) experienced an MAE during the first year after surgery compared with UCCs (7.9%) with an OR of 4.56 (95% CI 2.23 to 9.34, p<0.001). Analysing individual MAEs, this was significant for pneumonia (GFC: 9.2%; UCC: 2.9%; OR, 3.40 (95% CI 1.08 to 10.70), p=0.027) and delirium (GFC: 11.3%; UCC: 2.2%, OR, 5.76 (95% CI 1.64 to 20.23), p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our study hypothesis, the rate of MAEs was higher in GFCs than in UCCs. Delirium was revealed as a main contributor. Most likely, this was based on improved detection rather than a truly elevated incidence, which we interpret as positive effect of geriatric comanagement.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581.

Для цитирования: Blauth Michael, Joeris Alexander, Rometsch Elke, Espinoza-Rebmann Kathrin, Wattanapanom Pannida, Jarayabhand Rahat, Poeze Martijn, Wong Merng K, Kwek Ernest B K, Hegeman Johannes H, Perez-Uribarri Carlos, Guerado Enrique, Revak Thomas J, Zohner Sebastian, Joseph David, Gosch Markus. Geriatric fracture centre vs usual care after proximal femur fracture in older patients: what are the benefits? Results of a large international prospective multicentre study.. BMJ open. 2021. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039960.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.