DOI 10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.10.007
Smartwatch-Based Detection of Ventricular Dysrhythmias: A Systematic Review of Literature.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The rise of smartwatches introduces a novel technology for detecting dysrhythmias. However, the diagnosis of ventricular dysrhythmias (VDs) usually requires automatic recording modes. There is a scarcity of literature on smartwatch-based VDs detection.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a literature review to synthesize current evidence on the clinical profiles of smartwatch-detected VDs and to highlight their detectability in real-world settings.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2025 for studies reporting smartwatch-based detection of VDs, with availability of participant-level data. Two investigators independently extracted study data and quality.
RESULTS
A total of 20 patients from 18 articles were included, with a mean age of 48 years; 35% were over 60 years of age, and 35% had a documented history of structural heart disease. Primary complaints were palpitations (70%) and syncope (20%). Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was the most common dysrhythmia (60%), followed by polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (25%). Vasospastic angina and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia were the leading diagnoses. Interventions included coronary angiography (25%), electrophysiology studies (35%), catheter ablation (35%), and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (45%). The rest received medical therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Smartwatches may provide valuable outpatient data that support timely diagnosis and appropriate therapy across diverse clinical scenarios. As exemplified in this review, the detectability of VDs through smartwatches in real-world settings is feasible. Emergency department interrogation of smartwatch data may provide valuable information.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.