Comparison of the Wide-Awake Approach and Conventional Approach in Extensor Indicis Proprius-to-Extensor Pollicis Longus Tendon Transfer for Chronic Extensor Pollicis Longus Rupture.

BACKGROUND

The wide-awake approach enables surgeons to perform optimal tensioning of a transferred tendon intraoperatively. The authors hypothesized that the extensor indicis proprius-to-extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer using the wide-awake approach would yield better results than conventional surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of the prospectively collected data of 29 consecutive patients who underwent extensor indicis proprius-to-extensor pollicis longus tendon transfer. Patients were treated with the wide-awake approach (group A, n = 11) and conventional surgery under general anesthesia (group B, n = 18). The groups were compared retrospectively for thumb interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint motion, grip and pinch strength, specific extensor indicis proprius-to-extensor pollicis longus evaluation method (SEEM), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score at 6 weeks and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Group A showed significantly better interphalangeal joint flexion and total arc of motion at 6 weeks and 2, 4, and 6 months, and significantly better metacarpophalangeal joint flexion and total arc of motion at all time points. Interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joint extension showed no difference at all time points. Group A showed significantly better specific extensor indicis proprius-to-extensor pollicis longus evaluation method scores at 2 and 4 months, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores at 4, 6, and 12 months. Grip and pinch strength showed no difference at all time points. The complication rate and duration until return to work were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional approach, the wide-awake approach showed significantly better results in the thumb's range of motion and functional outcomes, especially in the early postoperative periods.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.