MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.purol.2017.04.006

Медицинская библиотека · Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2017

A bicentric comparative and prospective study between classic photovaporization and anatomical GreenLight laser vaporization for large-volume prostatic adenomas.

Hibon G, Léonard G, Franceschi A, Misrai V, Bruyère F

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Long-term outcome after prostate photovaporization (PVP) remains largely unknown, especially when performed on enlarged prostates. However, new vaporisation techniques (e.g., laser enucleation) are increasingly used. Our aim was to compare postoperative results after standard PVP to those of an anatomical technique.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This bicentric prospective study included males treated for enlarged prostate caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia using a GreenLight laser. Patients were preoperatively assessed according to prostate volume, post-void residual volume (PVR), maximum urinary-flow rate (Qmax), prostatic specific antigens, and International prostate symptom score (IPSS). Peroperative data included vaporization time, energy delivered, and operative length. Postoperative data at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were compared with initial data; all complications were recorded. Comparisons were made between the conventional vaporization technique versus anatomical vaporization, which initially differentiated the peripheral zone of the prostate using an enucleation technique but no morcellation.

RESULTS

Records from 106 surgical patients between December 2012 and December 2013 were analyzed. Operative length, vaporisation time, and energy used were greater in the anatomical PVP group. The average length of hospital stay (2.0 vs. 2.5 days), time with a catheter (1.3 vs. 1.9 days), IPSS (5.0 vs. 6.4), PVR (15.5 vs. 11.7mL), and Qmax (19.9 vs. 19.7mL/s) were comparable between the two groups. However, more complications occurred (27% vs. 37%), including stress urinary incontinence (0% vs. 8%) when using anatomic vaporization.

CONCLUSION

Despite comparable groups and similar functional results, anatomical PVP caused more stress incontinence. However, the learning curve between the two techniques may explain this difference.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Для цитирования: Hibon G, Léonard G, Franceschi A, Misrai V, Bruyère F. A bicentric comparative and prospective study between classic photovaporization and anatomical GreenLight laser vaporization for large-volume prostatic adenomas.. Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.04.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.